MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101960808 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2006.260030

Identification of Anatomical Landmarks for Registration of CT and Ultrasound Images in Computer-Assisted Shoulder Arthroscopy

2006· article· en· W2101960808 on OpenAlexaff
Kathrin Tyryshkin, Parvin Mousavi, David R. Pichora, Purang Abolmaesumi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage registrationComputer visionFiducial markerImaging phantomRobustness (evolution)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceIterative closest pointScapulaImage-guided surgeryArthroscopyPatient registrationMedicineRadiologyPoint cloudImage (mathematics)Anatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a phantom study that was conducted for an ultrasound-guided shoulder arthroscopy navigation system. The navigation system uses a surface model generated from pre-operative computed tomography images, which has to be registered to the patient during the procedure. The goal of this study was to determine the optimal regions on the scapula bone of the shoulder to achieve an acceptable registration. Experiments were performed to examine the robustness and suitability of these optimal regions by testing the sensitivity to variations in the initial alignment for two different registration algorithms, namely iterative closest point and sequential least squares estimation technique. The fiducial registration error was analyzed and compared for all experiments. Regions spread over the entire scapula result in significantly smaller registration error (p<0.001) than regions, concentrated around the shoulder joint and thus accessible during the shoulder arthroscopy. However, the results also showed that the registration is still acceptable for the image-guided navigation system when these accessible landmarks are used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSurgical Simulation and TrainingFrench-language works237,207