MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101966723 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2010.5717493

Local dissipative Hamiltonian realization by feedback regulation

2010· article· en· W2101966723 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Stability of Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissipative systemControl theory (sociology)RegulatorNonlinear systemAffine transformationRealization (probability)Hamiltonian systemHamiltonian (control theory)Feedback controlExpression (computer science)Computer scienceMathematicsControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)PhysicsMathematical analysisMathematical optimizationPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the design of smooth feedback regulators for control affine nonlinear systems. The reference dynamics to track is generated by a dissipative Hamiltonian system. The objective of the paper is to show that damping assignment can be achieved by regulation, thus avoiding the solution of the matching equations when the expression of an energy function is unknown. The proposed approach consists in computing an expression for a local error potential and use it to construct a smooth feedback regulator. Conditions for the existence of a stabilizing regulator are given. Applications to predator-prey systems are presented to illustrate the construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it