MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102019295 · doi:10.1049/ip-gtd:20050429

Islanding detection of inverter-based distributed generation

2006· article· en· W2102019295 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Generation Transmission and Distribution · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslandingAC powerInverterPower factorVoltagePower (physics)Distributed generationComputer scienceForcing (mathematics)EngineeringElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)Control (management)PhysicsRenewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An active islanding detection technique for an inverter-based distributed generator (DG) is presented. Two control strategies are studied: one in which the DG only supplies active power and one in which the DG supplies both active and reactive power to improve the power factor. The nondetection zone (NDZ) of the over/under voltage and frequency protection (OVP/UVP and OFP/UFP) method for each control strategy is determined. For the presented interface control, it is observed that the NDZ of the OVP/UVP and OFP/UFP is larger when the DG interface is designed to improve the power factor. In order to decrease the NDZ, an islanding detection method is designed that is based on creating a mismatch between the load and DG reactive power, thus forcing the frequency to deviate outside the OFP/UFP limits. It is shown that the proposed islanding detection technique is robust and has a negligible NDZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it