Uncovering nonlinear dynamics-the case study of sea clutter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nonlinear dynamics are basic to the characterization of many physical phenomena encountered in practice. Typically, we are given a time series of some observable(s) and the requirement is to uncover the underlying dynamics responsible for generating the time series. This problem becomes particularly challenging when the process and measurement equations of the dynamics are both nonlinear and noisy. Such a problem is exemplified by the case study of sea clutter which refers to radar backscatter from an ocean surface. After setting the stage for this case study, the paper presents tutorial reviews of: (1) the classical models of sea clutter based on the compound K distribution and (2) the application of chaos theory to sea clutter. Experimental results are presented that cast doubts on chaos as a possible nonlinear dynamical mechanism for the generation of sea clutter. Most importantly, experimental results show that on timescales smaller than a few seconds, sea clutter is very well described as a complex autoregressive process of order four or five. On larger timescales, gravity or swell waves cause this process to be modulated in both amplitude and frequency. It is shown that the amount of frequency modulation is correlated with the nonlinearity of the clutter signal. The dynamical model is an important step forward from the classical statistical approaches, but it is in its early stages of development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".