Compromised neuroimmune status in rats with experimental colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In colitis, chronic and recurrent inflammation is associated with a breakdown in host defence mechanisms that leads to local and systemic infection. Whether this is due to a compromised neuroimmune response has not been studied. Our aim was to determine if colitis altered the host neuroimmune response as reflected in either body temperature rhythm or the febrile responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Body temperature was monitored by telemetry from conscious, unrestrained male rats treated with trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid or saline. Twenty-six days after initial induction, colitis was reactivated. Animals were given LPS (50 microg kg-1 Escherichia coli LPS) during colitis and after reactivation. At the peak of colitis, treated rats showed a disruption of circadian body temperature rhythm, manifested as day-time fever followed by night-time hypothermia. In response to LPS, controls displayed a characteristic fever, whereas treated animals had a significantly reduced fever and low plasma levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). During reactivation of colitis, treated animals did not mount a fever or exhibit increased plasma levels of IL-6 and TNF-alpha after LPS. We conclude that experimental colitis is associated with a compromised neuroimmune status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".