Development of Standard Concentrations of Foliar Nutrients for Saskatoon
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Soil and foliar samples were collected from saskatoon orchards in Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Alberta, Canada from 1997 to 1999 and analyzed for macro- and micronutrient content. Foliar samples were collected twice a month from the end of May until September in 1997 to examine the pattern of change in foliar nutrient concentrations throughout the season and to determine the most stable time period for foliar sampling. This period was determined to be from the last week in July until mid-August. Nutrient concentrations of foliar samples collected during this period from 1997 to 1999 were summarized according to the mean, median, minimum, and maximum values. Mean foliar nutrient concentrations were as follows: 2.48% nitrogen (N), 0.18% phosphorus (P), 1.15% potassium (K), 0.15% sulfur (S), 1.52% calcium (Ca), 0.50% magnesium (Mg), 6.9 ppm copper (Cu), 106 ppm iron (Fe), 124 ppm manganese (Mn), 16 ppm zinc (Zn), and 27 ppm boron (B). A number of significant positive correlations were found between soil and foliar levels of a nutrient, with the majority of these correlations occurring for the nutrients Cu, P, and Mn. Another study conducted during 2001–2002 examined differences in the foliar nutrient concentrations of the saskatoon cultivars ‘Smoky’ and ‘Thiessen’ sampled from nine orchards in Saskatchewan. Foliar concentrations of N, K, S, Ca, Mg, Cu, Mn, Zn, and B were significantly higher in ‘Smoky’ than in ‘Thiessen,’ whereas foliar K content was higher in ‘Thiessen’ than in ‘Smoky’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it