MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102078432 · doi:10.1242/jcs.01389

Maternal UNC-45 is involved in cytokinesis and colocalizes with non-muscle myosin in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo

2004· article· en· W2102078432 on OpenAlexaff
Torah M. Kachur, Wanyuan Ao, Jeffrey S. Berger, David B. Pilgrim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cell Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCytokinesisMyosinCaenorhabditis elegansTetratricopeptideCell biologyEmbryoMitosisGeneticsCell divisionCellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Caenorhabditis elegans UNC-45 protein contains tetratricopeptide repeats and a domain with similarity to fungal proteins, and it differentially colocalizes with myosin heavy chain B in the body wall muscles of adult worms. Although it is essential for normal myosin filament assembly in body wall muscle development, strong mutants show a previously unexplained maternal effect. We show here that the UNC-45 protein is maternally contributed and is present in all cells of the early embryo whereas zygotic UNC-45 expression is only detected in the developing muscle cells. Embryos produced from adults with reduced germline expression of UNC-45 exhibit cytokinesis defects suggesting that UNC-45 has a novel role in the early embryo in addition to muscle development. Yeast two-hybrid screens show that UNC-45 can directly interact with NMY-2, a non-muscle type II myosin, and UNC-45 and NMY-2 colocalize at cell boundaries in early embryos. Localization of UNC-45 at these boundaries is dependent upon the presence of NMY-2. Our results suggest that UNC-45 interacts with more than one type of myosin and functions in the embryo to regulate cytoplasmic myosin assembly and/or stability during cytokinesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cell ScienceSame topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsFrench-language works237,207