MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102078838 · doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00508-2

Conference agreement on the definition of humanization and humanized care

2001· article· en· W2102078838 on OpenAlexaff
Takusei Umenai, M Wagner, L.A Page, Aníbal Faúndes, Daphne Rattner, Maria-Helena Dias, María Antonieta Rubio Tyrrell, Sonia Nussenzweig Hotimsky, Kiyoshi Haneda, Daisuke Onuki, Toshio Mori, Toru Sadamori, M Fujiwara, Saya Kikuchi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Library scienceMedicineState (computer science)Health carePolitical scienceSociologyLawSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.117
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.144
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1170.144
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0180.016
Scholarly communication0.0220.009
Open science0.0110.021
Research integrity0.0680.077
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsSame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207