Integrating spectral, spatial, and terrain variables for forest ecosystem classification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sets of spectral, spectral-spatial, textural, and geomor- phometric variables derived fram high spatial resolution Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI)and elevation data are tested to determine their ability to discriminate landscape-scale forest ecosystem classes for a study area in northern Ontario, Canada. First, linear discriminant analysis for various spectral and spectral-spatial variables indicated that a spatial resolution of approximately 6 m was optimal for discriminating six landscape-scaleforest ecosystem classes. Second, texture features, using second-order spatial statistics, significantly improved discrimination of the classes over the originalreflectance data. Finally, addition of terrain descriptors improved discrimination of the six forest ecosystem classes. It has been demonstrated that, in a low- to moderate-relief boreal environment,addition of textural and terrain variables to high- resolution CASI reflectance data provides improved discrim- ination of forest ecosystem classes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it