MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102116570 · doi:10.2310/7750.2014.13189

Trichodysplasia Spinulosa: Rare Presentation of Polyomavirus Infection in Immunocompromised Patients

2014· review· en· W2102116570 on OpenAlexaff
Mark G. Kirchhof, Kam Shojania, Mark Hull, Richard I. Crawford, Sheila Au

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPolyomavirus and related diseases
Canadian institutionsSKiN HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaProvidence Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatologyPathognomonicImmunosuppressionContext (archaeology)BiopsyValganciclovirPathologyDiseaseImmunologyGanciclovir

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Trichodysplasia spinulosa (TS) is a rare, striking, folliculocentric papular eruption seen exclusively in immunosuppressed patients. The eruption can be disfiguring, associated with leonine faces and alopecia. TS is caused by a polyomavirus, identified as trichodysplasia spinulosa polyomavirus (TSPyV). Few reports exist in the literature, and support for treatment options is sparse. METHOD AND RESULTS: We report a patient with TS with underlying lupus nephropathy and renal transplant-associated immunosuppression. Diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy and pathognomonic histologic findings in the context of her extensive, spiculated monomorphous papules. With a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis, oral valganciclovir was prescribed, and the patient showed marked skin texture improvement and hair regrowth. CONCLUSION: The continued reporting of cases of TS will improve clinical identification of this condition and provide better information regarding treatment and long-term consequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicPolyomavirus and related diseasesFrench-language works237,207