MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102136361 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2009.2036754

Dynamic Quadrant Swapping Scheme Implemented in a Post Conversion Block for I, Q Mismatch Reduction in a DQPSK Receiver

2010· article· en· W2102136361 on OpenAlexaff
Nelson Lam, Bosco Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrosstalkPhase-shift keyingImage responseComputer scienceBlock (permutation group theory)AlgorithmElectronic engineeringBit error rateMathematicsIntermediate frequencyTelecommunicationsEngineeringRadio frequencyDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new dynamic quadrant swapping scheme that reduces crosstalk due to I/Q path mismatch for DQPSK receiver. The scheme reduces crosstalk by selectively transforming/swapping the I, Q components of the received symbols. The scheme's effectiveness is demonstrated by applying it to the IF digitizer part of the receiver. In the IF digitizer the incoming IF (first IF) signal is mixed and then converted to two digital signals, the I and Q signals, both at a second IF. These digital signals are then fed into a post conversion block. In this block dynamic quadrant swapping is applied, which reduces the crosstalk. Using an IF digitizer that includes two separate mixers with two separate low pass sigma-delta modulators for I and Q paths, the scheme's effectiveness is tested. Both simulation results and measured results show a significant improvement in image rejection ratio and BER, when the scheme is applied. With a SNR of 10.8 dB, at a 160.16 MHz incoming IF, and with a data rate of 36 kbps, the scheme improves the measured BER from 4.2 × 10 to 1.4 × 10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">- 3</sup> . At a 10 MHz incoming IF, and with a data rate of 2 kbps, the scheme improves the measured image rejection ratio from 41 dB to 65 dB and the measured BER from 1.3 × 10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-3</sup> to 0.7 × 10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-3</sup> . The post conversion block is layout in 0.09 ¿m CMOS technology. It occupies an area of 0.00092 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> , and is simpler than previous reported schemes. The IF digitizer is fabricated in 0.35 ¿m CMOS technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207