MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102146483 · doi:10.1109/led.2011.2104937

A Study of Parasitic Series Resistance Components in In–Ga–Zn–Oxide (a-IGZO) Thin-Film Transistors

2011· article· en· W2102146483 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Electron Device Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsIGNIS Innovation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThin-film transistorChannel (broadcasting)Equivalent series resistanceParasitic elementMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsTransistorElectrodeOxideSeries (stratigraphy)Channel length modulationElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringMOSFETNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)VoltageEngineeringChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We extracted the effective channel length and parasitic series resistance in a-IGZO inverted-staggered etch-stop (ES) TFTs. When there is an overlap between the drain or source electrode and the FET channel, the resistance of the channel underneath the overlapping regions is very low compared with other channel region resistance. As a result, the effective channel length is smaller than the physical length. The aforementioned definition of effective channel length in terms of device geometric parameters seems to be specific for ES a-IGZO TFTs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.431
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it