MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102167914 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keg459

Post-onset inhibition of murine arthritis using combined chemokine antagonist therapy

2003· article· en· W2102167914 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiangnian Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish journal of rheumatology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersArthritis Society
KeywordsMedicineHistopathologyArthritisInfiltration (HVAC)ChemokineAntagonistAnkleImmunologyCellular infiltrationInflammationInternal medicineGastroenterologyPharmacologyPathologyReceptorMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of targeting the chemotaxis of monocytes and polymorphonuclear monocytes (PMNs) in situ in MRL-Faslpr arthritis. METHODS: MRL-Faslpr mice were injected intradermally with complete Freund's adjuvant and cellular infiltration into the joint was monitored. Once clinical disease developed, the animals received one of three treatments: MCP-1(9-76); MCP-1(9-76) plus Gro-alpha(8-73); or control peptide, MCP-1 Ala. The bimalleolar ankle width was measured for 11 days and histological examination of the joints was then assessed. RESULTS: Cellular infiltration started after the onset of ankle swelling, and increased progressively. The incidence of swelling and the histopathology was reduced after day 6 of treatment in the MCP-1(9-76)-treated mice. Mice treated with the two antagonists MCP-1(9-76) and Gro-alpha(8-73) displayed a further significant reduction in disease parameters. CONCLUSION: Treatment after disease onset with chemotactic antagonists for monocytes and PMNs significantly alleviated both the swelling and the histopathology seen in arthritis, suggesting that chemokine antagonists are an effective anti-inflammatory therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish journal of rheumatologySame topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesFrench-language works237,207