Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vehicle localization is a key issue that has recently attracted attention in a wide range of applications. Navigation, vehicle tracking, emergency calling, and location-based services are examples of emerging applications with a great demand for location information. The Global Positioning System (GPS) has been the de facto standard solution for the vehicle-localization problem. Nevertheless, GPS-based localization is inaccurate and unreliable due to GPS' inherent poor performance in vertical positioning and the prevalent horizontal movement, in addition to anomalies caused by line-of-sight occlusions and multipath issues in urban canyons. Although augmenting GPS localization with inertial sensory data has demonstrated significant performance improvements, there remain situations that give rise to degraded localization accuracy-a deficiency that many applications cannot tolerate. In this paper, we propose intervehicle-communication-assisted localization, a localization technique that takes advantage of the emerging vehicle ad hoc networks environments. Communication among vehicles is utilized to compute a relative vehicle location, the integration of which with motion information and GPS location estimates leading to highly accurate vehicle localization. This proposed localization technique is tested in various simulated road-segment scenarios. It is evident from the simulation results that intervehicle communication has the potential to lead to the improvement of the robustness and accuracy of vehicle-location estimation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".