The Significance of Hummocky Cross-Stratification (HCS) Wavelengths: Evidence from an Open-Coast Tidal Flat, South Korea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Although hummocky cross-stratification (HCS) is one of the most common and widely recognized structures in ancient storm-dominated successions, the stratigraphic variability and environmental significance of HCS wavelength (λ) are still not widely appreciated. New evidence from an open-coast intertidal flat where HCS might not have been expected to occur shows that the HCS becomes smaller in a landward direction because of a decrease of wave size. This confirms previous suggestions that the bedform responsible for HCS is a type of orbital ripple. A review of new and previously published data indicate that HCS wavelength is controlled by the bottom orbital diameter (d0) according to the relationship λ ≈ 0.75 d0. These observations imply that the maximum size of HCS should increase with decreasing water depth from the shelf to the surf zone (breaking point) but may then decrease landward of this point because wave size is depth limited. This suggests that it may be possible to use HCS size in paleo-environmental reconstructions to a greater degree than previously.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".