MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102230725 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2006.01

The Significance of Hummocky Cross-Stratification (HCS) Wavelengths: Evidence from an Open-Coast Tidal Flat, South Korea

2006· article· en· W2102230725 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoastal and Marine Dynamics
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyStratification (seeds)Tidal flatOceanographyWavelengthPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although hummocky cross-stratification (HCS) is one of the most common and widely recognized structures in ancient storm-dominated successions, the stratigraphic variability and environmental significance of HCS wavelength (λ) are still not widely appreciated. New evidence from an open-coast intertidal flat where HCS might not have been expected to occur shows that the HCS becomes smaller in a landward direction because of a decrease of wave size. This confirms previous suggestions that the bedform responsible for HCS is a type of orbital ripple. A review of new and previously published data indicate that HCS wavelength is controlled by the bottom orbital diameter (d0) according to the relationship λ ≈ 0.75 d0. These observations imply that the maximum size of HCS should increase with decreasing water depth from the shelf to the surf zone (breaking point) but may then decrease landward of this point because wave size is depth limited. This suggests that it may be possible to use HCS size in paleo-environmental reconstructions to a greater degree than previously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it