E2F-Dependent Repression of Topoisomerase II Regulates Heterochromatin Formation and Apoptosis in Cells with Melanoma-Prone Mutation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RB pathway mutations, especially at the CDK4 and INK4A loci, are hallmarks of melanomagenesis. It is presently unclear what advantages these alterations confer during melanoma progression and how they influence melanoma therapy. Topoisomerase II inhibitors are widely used to treat human malignancies, including melanoma, although their variable success is attributable to a poor understanding of their mechanism of action. Using mouse and human cells harboring the melanoma-prone p16Ink4a-insensitive CDK4R24C mutation, we show here that topoisomerase II proteins are direct targets of E2F-mediated repression. Drug-treated cells fail to load repressor E2Fs on topoisomerase II promoters leading to elevated topoisomerase II levels and an enhanced sensitivity of cells to apoptosis. This is associated with the increased formation of heterochromatin domains enriched in structural heterochromatin proteins, methylated histones H3/H4, and topoisomerase II. We refer to these preapoptotic heterochromatin domains as apoptosis-associated heterochromatic foci. We suggest that cellular apoptosis is preceded by an intermediary chromatin remodeling state that involves alterations of DNA topology by topoisomerase II enzymes and gene silencing via formation of heterochromatin. These observations provide novel insight into the mechanism of drug action that influence treatment outcome: drug sensitivity or drug resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".