Enhancement of aqueous solubility of itraconazole by complexation with cyclodextrins using supercritical carbon dioxide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The formation of inclusion complexes between itraconazole, a highly hydrophobic drug, and α-, β-, γ-, and hydroxylpropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) were assessed using phase-solubility techniques. The solubility of itraconazole increased as a function of cyclodextrin concentration showing an AL phase diagram indicating the formation of soluble complexes with 1:1 stoichiometry. The Gibbs free energies of transfer of the drug from aqueous solution to the cavity of cyclodextrin are negative and increase in magnitude with increasing cyclodextrin concentration. The solubility of itraconazole, as well as the stability constant of its complex with HP-β-CD, are found to be affected by the pH of the medium. The HP-β-CD cavity was found to have a greater affinity for the unionized itraconazole than the protonated one. It was found that the interaction between the drug and the cyclodextrin is weakened as the medium becomes more apolar by the addition of methanol. Also, the size of the cavity of the cyclodextrins plays an important role in the association process. Furthermore, the thermodynamic parameters of the complexation process were calculated, by monitoring the isothermic solubility diagrams of itraconazoleHP-β-CD and itraconazoleβ-CD at various temperatures, to gain information on the driving forces for the formation of inclusion complexes. Drug formulations of itraconazole were prepared by complexation of the drug into different cyclodextrins using supercritical carbon dioxide in a static mode. The effects of cyclodextrins on the prepared inclusion complexes were studied and characterized by differential scanning calorimetry.Key words: cyclodextrin, itraconazole, inclusion complex, solubility, stability constant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".