BEHAVIORAL AND PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CHILDREN OF PARENTS WITH SOCIAL PHOBIA: A PILOT STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies have noted a relation between the pattern of resting frontal EEG activity and individual differences in affective style in typically developing infants, children, and adults. The authors conducted a pilot study to investigate the pattern of frontal EEG activity during a resting condition (eyes-open, eyes-closed) in a group of children who had one parent clinically diagnosed with social phobia (SP; n = 6) and in a group of typically developing children of similar age with healthy parents (n = 7). Patients with a primary DSM-IV diagnosis of SP with at least one biological child were recruited from the Anxiety Disorders Clinic at McMaster University Medical Centre. We found that children of parents clinically diagnosed with SP tended to exhibit higher overall resting frontal EEG activity compared with the children of healthy parents. This pattern of overall high EEG activity that is specific to the frontal region is similar to that observed in socially anxious profiles. Preliminary findings are discussed in terms of how overall resting frontal brain activation may be an early psychophysiological marker for placing children of parents with social phobia at risk for socioemotional problems before such problems emerge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".