MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102255393 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1995.526413

Alternative manipulation strategies in a virtual reality training system

2002· article· en· W2102255393 on OpenAlex
A. Shaikh, E. Garant, A. Okapuu-von Veh, A.S. Malowany, A. Daigle, P. Desbiens, J.-C. Rizzi, R.J. Marceau, R. Gauthier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecPolytechnique MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirtual realityImmersion (mathematics)Computer scienceHuman–computer interactionInterface (matter)Training systemTraining (meteorology)Test (biology)Field (mathematics)Simulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The importance of training simulators in the power industry has been recognised due to the risks involved for a professional in this field. However more work is needed on the training user interface. The virtual reality (VR) training simulator ESOPE-VR has been developed as a functional VR system which serves as an extension to the traditional simulator. Many issues were confronted during this development. One major issue is the man-machine strategy and interface to be used. This issue is critical since it influences the level of immersion or realism that can be achieved. This paper discusses three different hand controlled manipulation devices, their integration and some test data showing the effectiveness of their manipulation strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHand Gesture Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207