MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102258965 · doi:10.1049/iet-map.2011.0297

Variable coupler for Butler beam-forming matrix with low sidelobe level

2012· article· en· W2102258965 on OpenAlexafffund
Tarek Djerafi, Jules Gauthier, Kehui Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDirectivityHFSSOpticsBandwidth (computing)Coupling (piping)Beam propagation methodPower dividers and directional couplersHybrid couplerAcousticsExcitationWaveguideRadiationMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineeringAntenna (radio)TelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringMicrostrip antennaMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Butler beam-forming network with low sidelobe level (SLL) is proposed and demonstrated on the basis of variable couplers. A set of couplers with 0.75, 1.26, 3, 6 and 8 dB coupling levels are required to achieve an SLL of −13.6, −20 and −30 dB. Such variable coupling is achieved by creating a movable mirror structure in the common region of perpendicularly or cross-coupled waveguide building blocks. This mirror is composed of a 5×7 cylindrical rod array. The coupling and directivity characteristics depend on the position of this proposed fringe structure. In this work, WR28 is used to demonstrate the capability of this type of coupler over 26–30 GHz bandwidth. Structure usefulness and design procedure are validated by electromagnetic simulation high frequency structural simulator (HFSS) and prototype experimentation. Very good results are observed, that have also demonstrated attractive performances of the coupler. Measured results of couplers are used to assess the properties of Butler matrix with excitation coefficients corresponding to −13.6, −20 and −30 dB of SLLs. Radiation patterns obtained by this investigation show a promising performance. This proposed technique allows flexibility in the choice of excitation coefficients without degradation on the efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Microwaves Antennas & PropagationSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207