MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102284520 · doi:10.1109/icip.2005.1529956

A probabilistic living cell segmentation model

2005· article· en· W2102284520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsSegmentationImage segmentationProbabilistic logicStem cellComputer scienceCellHematopoietic stem cellArtificial intelligenceMotilityComputer visionHaematopoiesisPattern recognition (psychology)BiologyCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A better understanding of cell behavior is very important in drug and disease research. Cell size, shape, and motility may play a key role in stem-cell specialization or cancer development. However the traditional method of inferring these values from image sequences manually is such an onerous task that automated methods of cell tracking and segmentation are in high demanded, especially given the increasing amount of cell data being collected. In this paper, a novel probabilistic cell model is designed to segment the individual hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) extracted from mice bone marrow cells. The proposed cell model has been successfully applied to HSC segmentation, identifying the most probable cell locations in the image on the basis of cell brightness and morphology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Imaging for Blood DiseasesFrench-language works237,207