MMP-2 is localized to the mitochondria-associated membrane of the heart
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) has been extensively studied in the context of extracellular matrix remodeling but is also localized within cells and can be activated by prooxidants to proteolyze specific intercellular targets. Although there are reports of MMP-2 in mitochondria, a critical source of cellular oxidative stress, these studies did not take into account the presence within their preparations of the mitochondria-associated membrane (MAM), a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We hypothesized that MMP-2 is situated in the MAM and therefore investigated its subcellular distribution between mitochondria and the MAM. Immunogold electron microscopy revealed MMP-2 localized in mitochondria of heart sections from mice. In contrast, immunofluorescence analysis of an MMP-2:HaloTag fusion protein expressed in HL-1 cardiomyocytes showed an ER-like distribution, with greater colocalization with an ER marker (protein disulfide isomerase) relative to the mitochondrial marker, MitoTracker red. Although MMP-2 protein and enzymatic activity were present in crude mitochondrial fractions, once these were separated into purified mitochondria and MAM, MMP-2 was principally associated with the latter. Thus, although mitochondria may contain minimal levels of MMP-2, the majority of MMP-2 previously identified as "mitochondrial" is in fact associated with the MAM. We also found that calreticulin, an ER- and MAM-resident Ca(2+) handling protein and chaperone, could be proteolyzed by MMP-2 in vitro. MAM-localized MMP-2 could therefore potentially impact mitochondrial function by affecting ER-mitochondrial Ca(2+) signaling via its proteolysis of calreticulin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".