[Efficacy of modified B-NHL-BFM-90 protocol on anaplastic T-cell lymphoma in children and adolescents].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Anaplastic T-cell lymphoma in children and adolescents is an aggressive malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The optimal treatment regimen needs to be investigated. This study was to evaluate the efficacy of modified B-NHL-BFM-90 protocol on anaplastic T-cell lymphoma in children and adolescents. METHODS: From October 2002 to January 2008, 18 untreated anaplastic T-cell lymphoma patients aged less than 16 years were enrolled, and treated with modified B-NHL-BFM-90 protocol including cyclophosphamide, vincristine, ifosfamide, etoposide, adriamycin, HD-methotrexate, vindesine, dexamethasone, cytarabine/HD-cytarabine. Intrathecal injection was given every course. RESULTS: Of the 18 patients, 15 (83.3%) achieved complete remission (CR), and three (16.7%) achieved partial remission (PR). The patients were followed up for 4-68 months (median, 31 months). The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rates were (87.4+/-8.4)% for all patients, 100% for stage II patients, and (85.1+/-9.7)% for stage III/IV patients; 100% for low risk group, (88.9+/-10.5)% for moderate risk group, and (80.0+/-17.9)% for high risk group. Most patients suffered from grade 3-4 myelosuppression and recovered after active support care. One patient with stage IV disease received autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) after CR and was still alive. Two patients had tumor relapsed and died at three and five months after off treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Modified B-NHL-BFM-90 protocol, with tolerable toxicity, is an effective treatment regimen for anaplastic T-cell lymphoma in children and adolescents. It should be used in experienced cancer centers and hematological units.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".