Una nueva dirección para Canadá: La "visión del norte" del gobierno del primer ministro John G. Diefenbaker
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el articulo se analizan los origenes y la implementacion del proyecto del gobierno del Primer Ministro John G. Diefenbaker durante el sexenio 1957-1963 para el desarrollo del norte de Canada conocido popularmente como la Northern Vision (la Vision del Norte). Se examinan los diversos motivos para la adopcion de la Vision –que constituia parte de un proyecto mucho mas grande para el desarrollo de la nacion en general–, como la parte principal del programa electoral del Progressive Conservative Party, PCP (Partido Conservador Progresista), en 1958, asi como la influencia de Diefenbaker y sus asesores principales (Alvin Hamilton, Cerril W. Menzies y Roy Faibish) con respecto a su elaboracion. Se enfoca, en particular, sobre el programa llamado Roads to Resources, que fue visto como la clave para el desarrollo y poblamiento del norte canadiense. Se concluye con una evaluacion de su impacto en las decadas posteriores sobre la politica federal referente al norte y la formacion de la identidad de los canadienses como pueblo
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".