MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca<sup>2+</sup>cycling adaptations during 16 h of heavy intermittent cycle exercise

2005· article· en· W2102374229 on OpenAlexaff
Graham P. Holloway, H. J. Green, Todd A. Duhamel, Shane Ferth, J. W. Moule, J. Ouyang, A. Russell Tupling

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclingEndoplasmic reticulumPhysical exerciseCalciumChemistryInternal medicineMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The repetition-dependent effects of a repetitive heavy exercise protocol previously shown to alter muscle mechanic behavior (Green HJ, Duhamel TA, Ferth S, Holloway GP, Thomas MM, Tupling AR, Rich SM, and Yau JE. J Appl Physiol 97: 2166-2175, 2004) on muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+-transport properties, measured in vitro, were examined in 12 untrained volunteers [peak aerobic power (VO2(peak)) = 44.3 +/- 0.66 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)]. The protocol involved 6 min of cycle exercise performed at approximately 91% VO2(peak) once per hour for 16 h. Tissue samples were obtained from the vastus lateralis before (B) and after (A) exercise at repetitions 1 (R1), 2 (R2), 9 (R9), and 16 (R16). Reductions (P < 0.05) in maximal Ca2+-ATPase activity (Vmax) of 26 and 12% with exercise were only observed at R1 and R16, respectively. Vmax remained depressed (P < 0.05) at R2 (B) but not at R9 (B) and R16 (B). No changes were observed in two other kinetic properties of the enzyme, namely the Hill coefficient (defined as the slope of the relationship between Ca2+-ATPase activity and free Ca2+ concentration) and the Ca50 (defined as the free Ca2+ concentration needed to elicit 50% Vmax). Changes in Ca2+ uptake (measured at 2,000 nM) with exercise and recovery generally paralleled Vmax. The apparent coupling ratio, defined as the ratio between Ca2+ uptake and Vmax, was unaffected by the intermittent protocol. Reductions (P < 0.05) in phase 1 Ca2+ release (32%) were only observed at R1. No differences were observed between B and A for R2, R9, and R16 or between B and B for R1, R2, R9, and R16. The changes in phase 2 Ca2+ release were as observed for phase 1 Ca2+ release. It is concluded that the SR Ca2+-handling properties, in general, display rapid adaptations to repetitive exercise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207