Nonlinear process identification in the presence of multiple correlated hidden scheduling variables with missing data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identification of nonlinear processes in the presence of noise corrupted and correlated multiple scheduling variables with missing data is concerned. The dynamics of the hidden scheduling variables are represented by a state‐space model with unknown parameters. To assure generality, it is assumed that the multiple correlated scheduling variables are corrupted with unknown disturbances and the identification dataset is incomplete with missing data. A multiple model approach is proposed to formulate the identification problem of nonlinear systems under the framework of the expectation‐maximization algorithm. The parameters of the local process models and scheduling variable models as well as the hyperparameters of the weighting function are simultaneously estimated. The particle smoothing technique is adopted to handle the computation of expectation functions. The efficiency of the proposed method is demonstrated through several simulated examples. Through an experimental study on a pilot‐scale multitank system, the practical advantages are further illustrated. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 61: 3270–3287, 2015
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".