Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our work and others' over the past few years have led to the identification of new roles of PAK1 in cardiac physiology, such as the regulation of cardiac ion channel and actomyosin function. More recent studies have revealed that PAK1-deficient mice were vulnerable to cardiac hypertrophy and readily progress to failure under sustained pressure overload and susceptible to ischemia/reperfusion injury. Our further study indicated that the PAK1 activator FTY720 was able to prevent this pressure overload-induced hypertrophy in wild-type mice without compromising their cardiac functions. A cardiac protective effect against ischemia/reperfusion injury by FTY720 was also observed in both rat and mouse models by us and others. Thus, these studies suggest that PAK1 is more important in the heart than previously thought, in particular a therapeutic potential of PAK1 activators. In the future, in-depth investigations are required to further substantiate our hypotheses on mechanisms for PAK1 function in the heart and to explore a therapeutic potential of FTY720 and other PAK1 activators in heart disease conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".