MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102390718 · doi:10.1109/icdew.2007.4401031

Poster Session: Adapting Mixed Workloads to Meet SLOs in Autonomic DBMSs

2007· article· en· W2102390718 on OpenAlexaff
Baoning Niu, Patrick Martin, Wendy Powley, Paul Bird, Randy Horman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsIBM (Canada)Queen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOnline transaction processingWorkloadComputer scienceOnline analytical processingAdaptation (eye)IBMSession (web analytics)DatabaseMalleabilityDistributed computingOperating systemTransaction processingDatabase transactionData warehouseWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Workload adaptation allows an autonomic database management system (DBMS) to efficiently make use of its resources and meet its service level Objectives (SLOs) by filtering or controlling the workload presented to it. Workload adaptation has been shown to be effective for OLAP and OLTP workloads. We outline a framework of workload adaptation and explain how it can be extended to manage mixed workloads comprised of both OLAP and OLTP queries. Experiments with IBM® DB2® Universal Database™ are presented that illustrate the effectiveness of our techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207