MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102439320 · doi:10.1109/temc.2007.908812

Modeling the Terminal Response of a Bundle of Twisted-Wire Pairs Excited by a Plane Wave

2007· article· en· W2102439320 on OpenAlexaff
Roberto B. Armenta, Costas D. Sarris

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital subscriber lineTwisted pairElectromagnetic interferenceBundleTransmission lineElectronic engineeringContext (archaeology)Plane waveTransmission (telecommunications)Topology (electrical circuits)Interference (communication)PhysicsAcousticsEngineeringComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsOpticsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proposal to use multiple-input multiple-output vectored transmission in digital subscriber line (DSL) systems has prompted a revision of the channel noise models used to characterize twisted-wire pairs (TWPs). In this context, a transmission-line model for predicting the terminal response of a bundle of TWPs to an illuminating plane-wave electromagnetic field is introduced. The corresponding nonuniform transmission-line equations for the multiconductor system are solved numerically. The goal of the model is to provide a tool for solving a wide variety of radio-frequency interference problems in DSL systems. Computed results for a variety of TWP structures are presented, and the issue of small random twisting nonuniformities is explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic CompatibilitySame topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207