MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102442016 · doi:10.1109/icc.1994.368824

A state-space reduction method for computing the cell loss probability in ATM networks

2002· article· en· W2102442016 on OpenAlexafffund
Jun Yei, Tao Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsTechnical University of Nova Scotia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputationReduction (mathematics)Markov processComputer scienceMarkov chainState spaceFraction (chemistry)Stochastic processTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematicsMachine learningStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cell loss performance analysis in ATM networks has been considered as one of the most important issues in congestion control which is vital to the success of the ATM technique. In recent years, numerous approaches have been proposed for the computation of the cell loss probability in ATM networks. Among them are the stochastic fluid-flow (SFF) method and the Markov modulated deterministic process (MMDP) approach. The MMDP approach is basically a discrete version of the SFF method and it is numerical stable. Both approaches, however, require a considerable amount of computation time for problems of practical size. In this paper, we propose a state-space reduction method for both approaches. The idea is to find an appropriate tradeoff between the efficiency and accuracy. As a result, the proposed approach performs very well in terms of both accuracy and efficiency. For cases of practical interest (in which cell loss probabilities ranges from 10/sup -6/ to 10/sup -10/) its computation time is only a fraction of one CPU second.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207