MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102457434 · doi:10.5430/rwe.v5n2p74

The Economic Value of Environmental Capital Inputs Used to Produce the Gross Domestic Product in Ghana, 1993 to 2012

2014· article· en· W2102457434 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in World Economy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Ghana
KeywordsGross domestic productGoods and servicesEconomicsPer capitaAgricultural economicsReal gross domestic productGross fixed capital formationBusinessEconomyMonetary economicsEconomic growthPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ghana has been one of the fastest growing countries in the world over the last decade driven by exports of oil from newly-discovered offshore oil fields, the export of its traditional commodities of cocoa, gold and other extractive minerals, construction, and the expansion of services related to banking, information and communication technologies, and tourism. Measured by the change in real gross domestic product (GDP), the economy grew at a pace of 7.5% over the period from 2004 to 2013 and 8.6% from 2009 to 2013, and was among the top 15 performers in the world. The Ghanaian economy was formally classified as lower-middle-income in 2010 with a per capita income of over 1,300 United States dollars. Our study focuses on measuring the values of labour and capital inputs used to produce the goods and services incorporated in the GDP. We acknowledge the existence of two types of capital inputs used to produce final goods and services. These are (1) human-made or manufactured capital such as machinery and equipment and (2) environmental capital items such as proven oil and gas reserves, mineral deposits, forest and water resources that are required to produce final goods and services in the economy. We estimated the size of environmental or natural capital stock used to produce the GDP over the twenty-year period, 1993 to 2012 assuming that the economy as a whole exhibited a constant returns to scale feature. The results indicate that over the period, 1993 to 2012, the average share attributed to labour in the production of GDP was about 45%. Human-made capital inputs contributed on average about 19% of GDP. The remaining share of 36% was the estimated value of environmental capital inputs used to produce GDP. We also established that the aggregate environmental depreciation was significantly related to GDP in a positive log-linear fashion while its relationship to real interest rate was negative but not statistically significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it