MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102465557 · doi:10.5194/angeo-27-1113-2009

Azimuthal expansion of the dipolarization at geosynchronous orbits associated with substorms

2009· article· en· W2102465557 on OpenAlexafffund
Chris J. Watson, P. T. Jayachandran

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Geophysicae · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSubstormGeosynchronous orbitPhysicsAzimuthPolarGeophysicsPolar orbitComputational physicsMagnetic fieldSatelliteMagnetosphereAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Dipolarization, one of the main indicators of substorm expansion onset, represents topological changes in the magnetotail. It is believed that dipolarization is initiated at a longitudinally confined region in the tail, followed by the azimuthal expansion. There are very limited studies in the literature regarding the azimuthal propagation of the dipolarization front in the magnetotail. In this study we have used ten years of GOES data and POLAR and IMAGE data to study the characteristics of the propagation of the dipolarization fronts at the geosynchronous orbit. We have identified a number of dipolarization events in the GOES magnetic field data and substorm onsets from POLAR UVI and IMAGE-FUV measurements. Using the delay of dipolarization signatures at the two GOES satellites and onset times from POLAR and IMAGE measurements we have estimated the propagation speed of the dipolarization fronts. The calculated speeds vary between 10 km/s and 420 km/s and show a power law distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales GeophysicaeSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207