Interference control and chip waveform design in multirate DS-CDMA communication systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the interference effects in a multirate DS-code-division multiple-access (CDMA) system. Optimum chip waveform selection with arbitrary shapes is analyzed using a time domain approach. The problem is posed as an interference minimization problem under energy and time-bandwidth constraints and prolate spheroidal wave functions are used to arrive at a solution. Various factors affecting the interference are identified and the trade-off between competing factors is analyzed. The effect of the interchip interference on the optimum chip waveform design is also quantified under a practical bandwidth constraint. We study the benefits of employing two different chip waveforms for two classes of users. We compare the performance of systems employing two different chip waveforms with that of a single-chip waveform system such as IS-95. We show that when the power imbalance is large, it is advantageous to employ two different chip waveforms for different classes of users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it