MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102485639 · doi:10.1109/acc.2007.4282181

Design of a TS Based Fuzzy Nonlinear Unknown Input Observer with Fault Diagnosis Applications

2007· article· en· W2102485639 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Fault detection and isolationObserver (physics)Nonlinear systemFault (geology)Fuzzy logicFuzzy control systemComputer scienceActuatorMathematicsMathematical optimizationControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An approach for nonlinear unknown input observer (NUIO) design for nonlinear systems representable by a Takagi-Sugeno (TS) fuzzy system. The proposed NUIO design for TS fuzzy systems is carried out for two cases: 1) the premise variables do not depend on the unmeasured state variables; and 2) the premise variables depend on the unmeasured state variables. Sufficient conditions for the existence of NUIOs are derived, and an LMI based observer design strategy is proposed. Once the NUIOs are designed, fault detection and isolation problems for nonlinear systems described by TS fuzzy systems using the new NUIO is presented. To solve the actuator fault isolation problem, a system structure with two groups of inputs where one group is treated as unknown inputs is developed. A bank of NUIOs is then designed in order to investigate the following fault diagnosis problems: 1) How can the NUIOs be used for detecting faults? 2) Under what conditions is it possible to isolate single and/or multiple faults? 3) What is the maximum number of faults that can be isolated simultaneously? 4) How can multiple fault isolation be achieved? The article presents an NUIO based fault detection scheme for problem 1, gives sufficient conditions for problem 2, determines the maximum number of faults that can be isolated for problem 3, and proposes a fault diagnosis scheme using a bank of NUIOs to solve problem 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it