MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102499212 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2003.816818

A behavior-based mobile robot with a visual landmark-recognition system

2003· article· en· W2102499212 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandmarkMobile robotArtificial intelligenceObstacle avoidanceComputer visionComputer scienceMobile robot navigationRobotFuzzy logicRobot control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, based on behavior-based artificial intelligence we have built a fully autonomous mobile robot. Several modules are developed for the mobile robot to implement different levels of competences and behaviors, where each module itself generates behaviors. New modules can be easily added to the robot system to improve in the competence without changing any existing modules. A vision-based landmark recognition system for robot navigation is developed as the highest layer in the subsumption architecture. A genetic-algorithm-based search method for pattern recognition of digital images is proposed and implemented to recognize artificial landmarks by searching all the predefined patterns. The vision layer is capable of generating the desired behaviors corresponding to various landmarks. A combination of eight ultrasonic sensors is designed to implement obstacle-avoidance behaviors through a set of fuzzy rules. The effectiveness of this behavior-based mobile robot is demonstrated by experimental studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it