MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102552432 · doi:10.1061/9780784413692.018

Corrosion Control Strategies to Protect Linear Assets: Dundas Street Sanitary Sewer and Forcemain Project, Oakville in the Region of Halton, Ontario, Canada

2014· article· en· W2102552432 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mark Swan, Rick Ranalli

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2014 · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsCanadian Sleep SocietyRegional Municipality of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecast concretePopulationTwin citiesBoulevardEnvironmental scienceSanitary sewerSewage treatmentCombined sewerEngineeringCivil engineeringEnvironmental engineeringGeographyMetropolitan areaArchaeologyStormwater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Halton Region (the Region) is located west of the City of Toronto and is part of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). It is one of the fastest growing municipalities in the GTA with the majority of the population residing in the following four urban areas: Oakville, Burlington, Milton, and Halton Hills. AECOM recently completed the Region's Sustainable Halton Master Plan that lays out sustainable growth and servicing strategies to meet the population and employment needs to the year 2031. As part of the Region's sustainable growth strategy, the Dundas Street corridor is key to developing the north end of the Town of Oakville. To facilitate this growth, AECOM designed the 1,000 L/s North Oakville Wastewater Pump Station (WWPS), twin 750 mm forcemains and 1,200 mm sanitary sewer, which was constructed in a 2,100 mm tunnel. This paper focuses on the corrosion reduction measures developed during the design phase of the project and implementation issues that occurred during construction. The 1,200 mm sanitary sewer and twin 750 mm forcemains carry sewage 2.6 km from the newly constructed North Oakville WWPS at Neyagawa Boulevard to Third Line on Dundas Street West. Design of the sanitary sewer and forcemains incorporates one cast-in-place manhole at Third Line and three precast manholes integrated as part of the tunnel shafts. The 450 m, 1,200 mm sanitary sewer was mostly constructed by tunnel methods. In addition to the sanitary sewer, twin 2.2 km, 750 mm diameter forcemains were constructed from the new North Oakville WWPS outletting into the new 1,200 mm diameter sanitary sewer on Dundas Street. The connection of the twin 750 mm forcemains to the 1,200 mm sanitary sewer was by two 7.1 m high drop structures (one for each forcemain). To reduce the release of odors and hydrogen sulfide (H2S), the project team investigated various design options that included several types of drop structures (e.g., vortex, baffle, vertical), various materials and coatings to resist concrete corrosion, and other site-specific options. Selection of the final drop structure design and construction materials was based on the team's previous large drop structure experience and input from various suppliers. The vortex drop structure was selected and designed to minimize maintenance and extend the life of the structure and downstream sewer. The design included the use of specialized concrete additives and coatings within the chambers in addition to a liner for the tunnel downstream of the chambers. The drop structure downstream pipe was protected from corrosion by T-Lock and Arrow-Lock. During construction, issues addressed included the adhesion of the specialized coating onto the chamber and release of the tunnel pipe liner at the interface between the tunnel and one of the chambers. The team worked with the suppliers and contractor to successfully resolve these issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePipelines 2014Same topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207