MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102555522 · doi:10.1029/2007eo110003

Developing standards for dissolved iron in seawater

2007· article· en· W2102555522 on OpenAlexaff
Kenneth S. Johnson, Virginia A. Elrod, Steve E. Fitzwater, Joshua N. Plant, Edward A. Boyle, Bridget A. Bergquist, Kenneth W. Bruland, Ana Aguilar‐Islas, Kristen N. Buck, Maeve C. Lohan, Geoffrey J. Smith, B. M. Sohst, Kenneth H. Coale, Michael Gordon, Sara J. Tanner, C. I. Measures, James W. Moffett, Katherine A. Barbeau, Andrew L. King, Andrew R. Bowie, Zanna Chase, Jay T. Cullen, Patrick Laan, William M. Landing, Jeffrey Mendez, Angela Milne, Hajime Obata, Takashi Doi, Lia Ossiander, Géraldine Sarthou, Peter N. Sedwick, Stan Van den Berg, Luis M. Laglera, Jingfeng Wu, Yihua Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeawaterPhytoplanktonIron fertilizationEnvironmental scienceOceanographyEnvironmental chemistryChemistryNutrientGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In nearly a dozen open‐ocean fertilization experiments conducted by more than 100 researchers from nearly 20 countries, adding iron at the sea surface has led to distinct increases in photosynthesis rates and biomass. These experiments confirmed the hypothesis proposed by the late John Martin [Martin, 1990] that dissolved iron concentration is a key variable that controls phytoplankton processes in ocean surface waters However, the measurement of dissolved iron concentration in seawater remains a difficult task [Bruland and Rue, 2001] with significant interlaboratory differences apparent at times. The availability of a seawater reference solution with well‐known dissolved iron (Fe) concentrations similar to open‐ocean values, which could be used for the calibration of equipment or other tasks, would greatly alleviate these problems [National Research Council (NRC), 2002[.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations261
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEosSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207