MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102566912 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.251807

Branching Fraction and Photon Energy Spectrum for<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">b</mml:mi><mml:mi/><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math>

2001· article· lv· W2102566912 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsLambdaEnergy (signal processing)HadronParticle physicsBranching fractionCombinatoricsMathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have measured the branching fraction and photon energy spectrum for the radiative penguin process $b\ensuremath{\rightarrow}s\ensuremath{\gamma}$. We find $B(b\ensuremath{\rightarrow}s\ensuremath{\gamma})\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}(3.21\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.43\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}{0.27}_{\ensuremath{-}0.10}^{+0.18})\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and from theory corrections. We obtain first and second moments of the photon energy spectrum above 2.0 GeV, $〈{E}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}}〉\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}2.346\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.032\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.011\mathrm{GeV}$, and $〈{E}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}}^{2}〉\ensuremath{-}〈{E}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}}{〉}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}0.0226\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0066\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0020{\mathrm{GeV}}^{2}$, where the errors are statistical and systematic. From the first moment, we obtain (in the modified minimal subtraction renormalization scheme, to order ${1/M}_{B}^{3}$ and ${\ensuremath{\beta}}_{0}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{s}^{2}$) the heavy quark effective theory parameter $\overline{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}0.35\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.08\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.10\mathrm{GeV}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it