MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102640103 · doi:10.1039/c1lc20251k

Thermoplastic elastomers for microfluidics: Towards a high-throughput fabrication method of multilayered microfluidic devices

2011· article· en· W2102640103 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Roy, Jean-Christophe Galas, Teodor Veres

Bibliographic record

VenueLab on a Chip · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermoformingMicrofluidicsFabricationMaterials scienceMicrofabricationPolydimethylsiloxaneFluidicsSoft lithographyMolding (decorative)Thermoplastic elastomerElastomerEmbossingNanotechnologyMicroelectromechanical systemsThermoplasticPDMS stampPolymerComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multilayer soft lithography of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is a well-known method for the fabrication of complex fluidic functions. With advantages and drawbacks, this technique allows fabrication of valves, pumps and micro-mixers. However, the process is inadequate for industrial applications. Here, we report a rapid prototyping technique for the fabrication of multilayer microfluidic devices, using a different and promising class of polymers. Using styrenic thermoplastic elastomers (TPE), we demonstrate a rapid technique for the fabrication and assembly of pneumatically driven valves in a multilayer microfluidic device made completely from thermoplastics. This material solution is transparent, biocompatible and as flexible as PDMS, and has high throughput thermoforming processing characteristics. We established a proof of principle for valving and mixing with three different grades of TPE using an SU-8 master mold. Specific viscoelastic properties of each grade allow us to report enhanced bonding capabilities from room temperature bonding to free pressure thermally assisted bonding. In terms of microfabrication, beyond classically embossing means, we demonstrate a high-throughput thermoforming method, where TPE molding experiments have been carried out without applied pressure and vacuum assistance within an overall cycle time of 180 s. The quality of the obtained thermoplastic systems show robust behavior and an opening/closing frequency of 5 Hz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations95
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLab on a ChipSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207