MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102656469 · doi:10.1109/icupc.1993.528527

CDMA distributed antenna system for indoor wireless communications

2002· article· en· W2102656469 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingComputer scienceDistributed antenna systemBandwidth (computing)WirelessRake receiverCode division multiple accessAntenna diversityElectronic engineeringDiversity schemeAntenna (radio)Computer networkChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an architecture and gives preliminary analysis of an indoor wireless CDMA communication system using a distributed antenna. The architecture is suitable to an environment affected by a large degree of shadowing. In such an environment if the data rate is not excessively high then due to the relatively small excess delays the channel exhibits relatively flat fading. The CDMA antenna concept is a means to artificially increase the excess delay so as to create frequency selective fading over the bandwidth of the transmitted signal, hence, frequency diversity is effectively achieved through the use of a Rake receiver. The architecture is applicable in scenarios where a leaky-feeder cable has traditionally been employed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207