MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102665654 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2002.1007595

Nonlinear singular spectrum analysis

2003· article· en· W2102665654 on OpenAlexaff
William W. Hsieh, Aiming Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical and numerical algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingular spectrum analysisNonlinear systemPrincipal component analysisSeries (stratigraphy)MathematicsTime seriesUnivariateWhite noiseSingular value decompositionAlgorithmApplied mathematicsControl theory (sociology)Multivariate statisticsComputer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Singular spectrum analysis (SSA), a linear univariate and multivariate time series technique, is essentially principal component analysis (PCA) applied to the time series and additional copies of the time series lagged by 1 to L-1 time steps. Neural network theory has meanwhile allowed PCA to be generalized to nonlinear PCA (NLPCA). In the paper, NLPCA is further extended to perform nonlinear SSA (NLSSA). First, SSA is applied to the data, then the leading principal components of the SSA are chosen as inputs to an NLPCA network (with a circular node at the bottleneck), which performs the NLSSA by nonlinearly combining all the input SSA modes into a single NLSSA mode. This nonlinear spectral technique allows the detection of highly anharmonic oscillations, as illustrated by a stretched square wave imbedded in white noise, which shows NLSSA to be superior to SSA and classical Fourier spectral analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStatistical and numerical algorithmsFrench-language works237,207