Screening <i>Leishmania donovani</i>‐specific genes required for visceral infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comparison of the Leishmania infantum genome with Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania major genomes has identified 25 L. infantum species-specific genes that are absent or pseudogenes in L. major and L. braziliensis. To determine whether these L. infantum species-specific genes are involved in visceral Leishmania infection, we cloned the orthologues of 14 L. infantum species-specific genes from the genetically closely related Leishmania donovani and introduced them into L. major. Two of these L. donovani species-specific genes were found to significantly increase L. major survival in visceral organs in BALB/c mice. One (orthologue of LinJ28_V3.0340; Ld2834) of these two genes was further investigated. The L. donovani Ld2834 null mutants displayed dramatically reduced virulence in BALB/c mice and were unable to survive in axenic amastigote culture conditions arguing that Ld2834 plays a crucial role in enabling L. donovani survive at the increased temperature typically associated with visceral organs. Ld2834 encodes a 50 kDa protein that is localized in the cytoplasma and has no significant sequence similarity with other known genes. This study validates the importance of comparative genomics for understanding Leishmania species pathology and argues that Leishmania species-specific genes play important roles in tissue tropism and virulence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".