Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against the hemagglutinin of H5N1 and antigenic investigation of avian influenza H5N1 viruses isolated from China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eight monoclonal antibodies against hemagglutinin of influenza A virus A/Chicken/Henan/01/2004(H5N1) were produced by a DNA prime and inactivated virions-boost immunization strategy. Among the monoclonal antibodies, 3 (H50, H56, and H57) exhibited hemagglutination inhibition activity. Western blot analyses revealed that all the monoclonal antibodies reacted to the prokaryotically expressed HA1 of A/Chicken/Henan/01/2004(H5N1). The monoclonal antibodies were then used to characterize 10 avian influenza H5N1 viruses isolated from China during 2004 to 2007, by using the hemagglutination inhibition test and the antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The isolates could be divided into 4 different antigenic groups according to their responses to the monoclonal antibodies. The antigenic grouping of these 10 H5N1 isolates, using these antibodies, did not completely match their phylogenetic classification based on the hemagglutinin sequences. The results showed there were antigenic variations within the subclade 2.3.4 of H5N1, which is predominant in China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".