MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102691859 · doi:10.3917/litt.153.0102

Miron et le partage du sensible

2009· article· fr· W2102691859 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claude Filteau

Bibliographic record

VenueLittérature · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary art, education, critique
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Le « partage du sensible » tel que le définit Jacques Rancière porte sur les « manières dont les figures de communauté se trouvent esthétiquement dessinées » dans une société démocratique. À partir de deux poèmes, « Le damned Canuck » et « Séquences » extraits de L’Homme rapaillé de Gaston Miron, l’on examine comment le poète québécois construit sa poétique de l’insulte et du juron à partir des « noms impropres » qui dénient aux travailleurs-artisans « raboteux, rabotés » le droit à une parole « audible » dans l’espace démocratique canadien. La réappropriation de ce qu’il appelle sa « mémoire osseuse » se fait alors pour Miron à partir d’un « écart fou » qui le condamne à errer dans des « lieux dépaysés ». Le je devient ce je impersonnel qui claudique dans son corps tout en affirmant par sa voix « lépreuse » et « ligneuse » sa résistance à la dialectisation du conflit qui construit l’espace commun démocratique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.020
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLittératureSame topicContemporary art, education, critiqueFrench-language works237,207