MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102694456 · doi:10.1310/1uga-ey2t-n6xp-1phe

Perceived Influence of the Environment on Social Participation Among Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury

2002· article· en· W2102694456 on OpenAlexaff
Luc Noreau, Patrick Fougeyrollas, Kathryn Boschen

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversité LavalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinal cord injuryMedicinePsychological interventionQuality of life (healthcare)Social environmentApplied psychologyPsychologySpinal cordNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a need to better understand the influence of environment in the lives of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) so that interventions can be proposed to enhance life satisfaction. The purpose of the study was to identify the major perceived environmental facilitators and obstacles to social participation. Data collected with the Measure of Quality of Environment suggest that most primary environmental facilitators are social, whereas the main obstacles are physical. Moreover, the perceived influence of the environment varies among individuals according to their personal characteristics (age, gender, level of injury), which illustrates the dynamics of the interactive process between personal (intrinsic) and environmental (extrinsic) factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury RehabilitationSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207