MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102702231 · doi:10.1145/1838599.1838624

transalpyne

2010· article· en· W2102702231 on OpenAlexaff
Luca De Feo, Éric Schost

Bibliographic record

VenueACM communications in computer algebra · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLogic, programming, and type systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScripting languageFeature (linguistics)Theoretical computer scienceProgramming languageFunction (biology)Transposition (logic)Computer programAlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present here transalpyne, a scripting language, to be executed on top of a computer algebra system, that is specifically conceived for automatic transposition of linear functions. Its type system is able to automatically infer all the possible linear functions realized by a computer program. The key feature of transalpyne is its ability to transform a computer program computing a linear function in another computer program computing the transposed linear function. The time and space complexity of the resulting program are similar to the original ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM communications in computer algebraSame topicLogic, programming, and type systemsFrench-language works237,207