MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102724716 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2003.813426

Denoising by spatial correlation thresholding

2003· article· en· W2102724716 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThresholdingWaveletPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceWavelet transformNoise (video)MathematicsNoise reductionSpatial correlationStationary wavelet transformAlgorithmCorrelationComputer scienceWavelet packet decompositionStatisticsImage (mathematics)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a spatial-correlation thresholding scheme for noise reduction by wavelet transform. Observing that edge structures are of high magnitude across wavelet scales but noise decays rapidly, we multiply two adjacent wavelet scales to form a spatial-correlation function to enhance significant structures and dilute noise. Dissimilar to the traditional thresholding schemes that apply threshold to the wavelet coefficients, the proposed scheme applies threshold directly to the scale correlation. A robust threshold is presented and experiments show that the proposed scheme outperforms the traditional thresholding methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it