Why T Cells of Thymic Versus Extrathymic Origin Are Functionally Different
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Age-related thymic involution severely impairs immune responsiveness. Strategies to generate T cells extrathymically are therefore being explored with intense interest. We have demonstrated that T cells produced extrathymically were functionally deficient relative to thymus-derived T cells. The main limitation of extrathymic T cells is their undue susceptibility to apoptosis; they thus do not expand properly when confronted with pathogens. Using oncostatin M-transgenic mice, we found that in the absence of lymphopenia, T cells of extrathymic origin constitutively undergo excessive homeostatic proliferation that leads to overproduction of IL-2 and IFN-gamma. IFN-gamma up-regulates Fas and FasL on extrathymic CD8 T cells, thereby leading to their demise by Fas-mediated apoptosis. Moreover, IFN-gamma and probably IL-2 curtail survival of extrathymic CD4 T cells by down-regulating IL-7Ralpha and Bcl-2, and they support a dramatic accumulation of FoxP3(+) T regulatory cells. Additionally, we show that wild-type thymus-derived T cells undergoing homeostatic proliferation in a lymphopenic host shared key features of extrathymic T cells. Our work explains how excessive lymphopenia-independent homeostatic proliferation renders extrathymic T cells functionally defective. Based on previous work and data presented herein, we propose that extrathymic T cells undergo constitutive homeostatic proliferation because they are positively selected by lymph node hemopoietic cells rather than by thymic epithelial cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".