MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Beam-spin asymmetries in the azimuthal distribution of pion electroproduction

2007· article· en· W2102771476 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Airapetian, Z. Akopov, M. Amarian, A. Andrus, E. C. Aschenauer, W. Augustyniak, H. Avakian, R. Avakian, A. Avetissian, E. Avetisyan, Alessandro Bacchetta, P. Bailey, S. Belostotski, N. Bianchi, H. P. Blok, H. Böttcher, A. Borissov, A. Borysenko, A. Brüll, V. Bryzgalov, M. Capiluppi, G. P. Capitani, G. Ciullo, M. Contalbrigo, P.F. Dalpiaz, W. Deconinck, R. De Leo, M. Demey, L. De Nardo, E. De Sanctis, E. Devitsin, M. Diefenthaler, P. Di Nezza, J. Dreschler, M. Düren, M. Ehrenfried, A. Elalaoui-Moulay, G. Elbakian, F. Ellinghaus, U. Elschenbroich, R. Fabbri, A. Fantoni, L. Felawka, S. Frullani, A. Funel, G. Gapienko, В. А. Гапиенко, F. Garibaldi, K. Garrow, G. Gavrilov, V. Gharibyan, F. Giordano, O. Grebeniouk, I. M. Gregor, H. Guler, C. Hadjidakis, K. Hafidi, M. Hartig, D. Hasch, T. Hasegawa, W.H.A. Hesselink, A. Hillenbrand, M. Hoek, Y. Holler, B. Hommez, I. Hristova, G. Iarygin, A. Ivanilov, A. Izotov, H. E. Jackson, A. Jgoun, R. Kaiser, T. Keri, E. Kinney, A. Kisselev, T. Kobayashi, M. Kopytin, В. А. Коротков, В. Козлов, Bernhard Krauß, P. Kravchenko, V. G. Krivokhijine, L. Lagamba, L. Lapikás, P. Lenisa, P. Liebing, L. A. Linden-Levy, W. Lorenzon, J. Lu, S. Lu, Bo-Qiang Ma, B. Maiheu, N. C. R. Makins, Y. J. Mao, B. Mariański, H. Marukyan, F. Masoli, V. Mexner, N. Meyners, T. Michler, O. Mikloukho, C. A. Miller, Y. Miyachi, V. Muccifora, M. Murray, А. Нагайцев, E. Nappi, Y. Naryshkin, M. Negodaev, W.‐D. Nowak, K. Oganessyan, H. Ohsuga, A. Osborne, R. Pérez-Benito, N. Pickert, M. Raithel, D. Reggiani, P. E. Reimer, A. Reischl, A. R. Reolon, K. Rith, G. Rosner, A. Rostomyan, L. Rubáček, J. Rubin, D. Ryckbosch, Y. Salomatin, I. Sanjiev, I. Savin, A. Schäfer, G. Schnell, K. P. Schüler, J. Seele, R. Seidl, B. Seitz, C. Shearer, T.-A. Shibata, V. Shutov, K. Sinram, M. Stancari, M. Statera, E. Steffens, J. J. M. Steijger, H. Stenzel, J. Stewart, F. Stinzing, J. Streit, P. Tait, Hiroki Tanaka, S. Taroian, B. Tchuiko, A. Terkulov, A. Trzciński, M. Tytgat, A. Vandenbroucke, P. B. van der Nat, G. van der Steenhoven, Y. Van Haarlem, V. Vikhrov, Christian Vogel, Shiqing Wang, Y. Ye, Z. Ye, S. Yen, B. Zihlmann, P. Żuprański

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Letters B · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareVlaamse regeringFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinistry of Education and ScienceBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceScottish Universities Physics AllianceU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsPionHERAAsymmetryNuclear physicsMesonHadronAmplitudeScatteringParticle physicsBeam (structure)Spin (aerodynamics)AzimuthScalingPhotonTransverse planeLeptonElectronQuantum chromodynamicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A measurement of the beam-spin asymmetry in the azimuthal distribution of pions produced in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering off protons is presented. The measurement was performed using the HERMES spectrometer with a hydrogen gas target and the longitudinally polarized 27.6 GeV positron beam of HERA. The sinusoidal amplitude of the dependence of the asymmetry on the angle ϕ of the hadron production plane around the virtual photon direction relative to the lepton scattering plane was measured for π+, π− and π0 mesons. The dependence of this amplitude on the Bjorken scaling variable and on the pion fractional energy and transverse momentum is presented. The results are compared to theoretical model calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics Letters BSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207