MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102798756 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2010.5683541

Probabilistic Analysis of Resequencing Queue Length in Multipath Packet Data Networks

2010· article· en· W2102798756 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Li, Yifeng Zhou, Louise Lamont, Minyi Huang, Yiqiang Q. Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork packetQueueMultipath propagationAlgorithmComputer networkReal-time computingChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In multipath packet data networks, packets may reach the receiver out-of-sequence, i.e., packets arrive at the receiver in a sequence different from their egressing order at the transmitter. In practice, however, many applications require an in-sequence packet delivery, meaning that packets need to be delivered to an application on the receiver in their original order at the transmitter. The in-sequence packet delivery is usually implemented through the approach of packet resequencing. In this paper, a multipath data network with packet resequencing is modeled and the asymptotic properties of the steady-state probability distribution of the resequencing queue length are studied. The assumptions used are that the packets sent from the transmitter according to a Poisson process, and the transmission period of a packet along a route follows an exponential distribution. An asymptotic distribution function of the resequencing queue length is derived for a large queue length in the steady state of the network. Numerical and simulation examples are presented to validate the derived result. Through comparisons of large deviation and asymptotic values of the resequencing queue length distribution, we show that the asymptotic result provides a better approximation to the distribution function of the resequencing queue length than the large deviation result reported in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207